Oskar Dudycz

Pragmatic about programming

Why Partial<Type> is an extremely useful TypeScript feature?

2021-02-24 oskar dudyczTypeScript

cover

If TypeScript were a friend of mine on Facebook, then I’d mark our relation as complicated. It’s a history of love & hate, or rather hate & appreciation. I was a TypeScript hater. It was lying in the same bucket as CoffeeScript, Dart and other weird variations of JavaScript.

That’s not all. As befits a C# developer, I was also a JavaScript hater. With JavaScript, relation quickly evolved into a friendship as soon as I realised that’s powerful when I use it in a functional way. I realised that I tried to apply the same coding patterns as in C#. JavaScript is a dynamic and more functional language. It was a recipe for disaster.

That’s why I wasn’t a TypeScript fan. Its early versions were adding too many incompatible to JavaScript specifics. TypeScript was, for me, the Troyan Horse made by imperative, compiled languages programmers.

That changed when TypeScript was aligned to EcmaScript 6 standard. I also read some eye-opening content about Type-Driven Development, e.g. “Domain Modeling Made Functional” by Scott Wlaschin. I realised that I could use TypeScript the same way I was using JavaScript but add more predictability and reliability related to types.

This week I was preparing the blog post about the v1 release of EventStoreDB gRPC NodeJS client. While working on the samples, I started to play with our API and building the current aggregate state from events (“aggregate stream”). NodeJS client is built with TypeScript, so why not?

I started by defining event types and aggregate data. I used the cinema ticket reservation as the sample use case.

interface SeatReserved {
    eventType: 'SeatReserved';
    reservationId: string;
    movieId: string;
    seatId: string;
    userId: string;
}

interface SeatChanged {
    eventType: 'SeatChanged';
    reservationId: string;
    newSeatId: string;
}

type ReservationEvents = SeatReserved | SeatChanged;

interface Reservation {
    reservationId: string;
    movieId: string;
    seatId: string;
    userId: string;
}

As you see - nothing extraordinary. You can reserve the seat and change it. The important part is that both events have the eventType property with a hardcoded event type name. We’ll use it later.

In Event Sourcing, events are logically grouped into streams. Streams are a representation of entities. Each business operation made on the entity should end up as the persisted event.

Entity state is retrieved by reading all events and applying them one by one in the order of appearance. We’re translating the set of events into a single entity. This is what’s the reduce function was built for. It executes a reducer function (that you can provide) on each array element, resulting in a single output value.

This is cool, but how can we do it with proper typing and not taking shortcuts with casting?

There are 3 things to cover:

  1. reduce in TypeScript is a generic method. It allows to provide the result type as a parameter. It doesn’t have to be the same as type of the array elements.
  2. You can also use optional param to provide the default value for accumulation.
  3. Use Partial<Type> as the generic reduce param. It constructs a type with all properties of Type set to optional. This utility will return a type that represents all subsets of a given type. This is extremely important, as TypeScript forces you to define all required properties. We’ll be merging different states of the aggregate state into the final one. Only the first event (SeatReserved) will provide all required fields. The other events will just do a partial update (SeatChanged only changes the seatId).

Let’s see how it works in practice:

var events: ReservationEvents[] = [
    {
        eventType: 'SeatReserved',
        reservationId: 'res-homeAlone-1',
        movieId: 'homeAlone',
        seatId: '44',
        userId: 'ms_smith',
    },
    {
        eventType: 'SeatChanged',
        reservationId: 'res-homeAlone-1',
        newSeatId: '21',
    },
];

const result = events.reduce<Partial<Reservation>>((currentState, event) => {
    switch (event.eventType) {
        case 'SeatReserved':
            return {
                ...currentState,
                reservationId: event.reservationId,
                movieId: event.movieId,
                seatId: event.seatId,
                userId: event.userId,
            };
        case 'SeatChanged': {
            return {
                ...currentState,
                seatId: event.newSeatId,
            };
        }
        default:
            throw 'Unexpected event type';
    }
}, {});

Thanks to strong typing (ReservationEvents), we’re sure about the events array’s content. We know that both events will have the eventType property. Having that, we can use switch and define a custom state mutation logic for each event.

The only thing left is to make sure that our final result has a proper state and can be used as the Reservation type. Remember, the result of reduce will be Partial with all required fields made optional. We can use type guard to verify if Partial is also a valid Reservation.

const reservationIsValid = 
    (reservation: Partial<Reservation>): reservation is Reservation => (
        !!reservation.reservationId &&
        !!reservation.movieId &&
        !!reservation.seatId &&
        !!reservation.userId 
    );

if(!reservationIsValid(reservation))
    throw "Reservation state is not valid!";

const reservation: Reservation = result;

As a bonus, let me present you the full working sample with the EventStoreDB NodeJS gRPC client:

import { EventStoreDBClient, JSONEventType, jsonEvent } from "@eventstore/db-client";

// define types
type SeatReserved = JSONEventType<
    "SeatReserved",
    {
        reservationId: string;
        movieId: string;
        userId: string;
        seatId: string;
    }
>;

type SeatChanged = JSONEventType<
    "SeatChanged",
    {
        reservationId: string;
        newSeatId: string;
    }
>;

type ReservationEvents = SeatReserved | SeatChanged;

interface Reservation {
    reservationId: string;
    movieId: string;
    userId: string;
    seatId: string;
}

const reservationIsValid = 
    (reservation: Partial<Reservation>): reservation is Reservation => (
        !!reservation.reservationId &&
        !!reservation.movieId &&
        !!reservation.seatId &&
        !!reservation.userId 
    );

// create events
const reservationId = "res-homeAlone-1";

const seatReserved = jsonEvent<SeatReserved>({
    type: "SeatReserved",
    data: {
        reservationId,
        movieId: "homeAlone",
        userId: "ms_smith",
        seatId: "44",
    },
});

const seatChanged = jsonEvent<SeatChanged>({
    type: "SeatChanged",
    data: {
        reservationId,
        newSeatId: '21',
    },
});   

// connect to EventStoreDB
const client = EventStoreDBClient.connectionString("esdb://localhost:2113?tls=false");

// append events
const appendResult = await client.appendToStream(
    reservationId, seatReserved, seatChanged);

// read appended events
const events: ReservationEvents[] = [];

for await (const resolvedEvent of eventStore.readStream(
  reservationId
)) {
  events.push(<ReservationEvents>{
    type: resolvedEvent.event!.type,
    data: resolvedEvent.event!.data,
    metadata: resolvedEvent.event?.metadata,
  });
}

// aggregate stream
const result = events.reduce<Partial<Reservation>>((acc, { event }) => {
    switch (event?.type) {
        case "SeatReserved":
            return {
                ...acc,
                reservationId: event.data.reservationId,
                movieId: event.data.movieId,
                seatId: event.data.seatId,
                userId: event.data.userId,
            };
        case "SeatChanged": {
            return {
                ...acc,
                seatId: event.data.newSeatId,
            };
        }
        default:
            return acc;
    }
}, {});

if(!reservationIsValid(result))
    throw "Reservation state is not valid!";

const reservation: Reservation = result;

I wrote a longer take on “How to get the current entity state from events?”. If you want to see how to use that pattern to build a whole NodeJS WebApi read my other article Straightforward Event Sourcing with TypeScript and NodeJS.

Cheers!

Oskar

👋 If you found this article helpful and want to get notification about the next one, subscribe to Architecture Weekly.

✉️ Join over 11500 subscribers, get the best resources to boost your skills, and stay updated with Software Architecture trends!

Loading...
Event-Driven by Oskar Dudycz

cover

Through my window, I see the result of good plans but poor execution. Opposite my flat, there is a partially completed construction place. Buildings were supposed to be eye-catching Mediterranean style apartments. Delivery date? Two years ago. Actual? More and more unknown.

Some time ago, I heard that using Event Sourcing makes creating Event-Driven Architecture easier. The arguments were correct, that if we’re already publishing events to trigger business workflows, then at some point, we may want to also store events to not lose information. Agreed. However, I also heard that keeping the state as events will simplify things. We’ll have a source of truth with a record of the system behaviour. This will allow, e.g. to confront the results of the operations with the recorded state. I’d agree with that, with one distinction. It’s easier as long as you already know Event Sourcing.

Many people in the DDD community claim that the essential is to properly break down the system into autonomous parts called bounded contexts. Once we have it, the rest is secondary and will sort itself out. For sure.

Many seasoned programmers speak similarly about new technologies. They claim that they can translate past experience into new technologies. That’s true that by analogy, they can catch the big picture quicker. But isn’t it a bold assumption to say that Win.Forms specialist will learn Angular quickly?

The end result may differ a lot from the initial ideas. I saw the plan of those buildings next to me. Now I can see the effects of the execution. Or actually, the lack.

I believe that we should carefully acknowledge not only the point of view of our authorities but also their seating point. If we want to find out how to form a wall, do we ask an architect or a foreman? An architect may know the theory, but the practice is what we’re looking for. On the other hand, if you want to know where to put the wall, you prefer the architect to do measurements. At least if you don’t want to have the roof falling to your head.

After I had torn a ligament in my knee, I went to two qualified orthopedists. One said I should have surgery and do a reconstruction. The second stated that there is no need for that; rehabilitation should be enough. Guess which one had a specialization in surgery and which in rehabilitation?

People usually give us advice from the point where they’re currently standing. They are entitled to a biased view. An architect who rarely does programming will tend to downplay the value of implementation and tactical patterns. Midlevel developers will focus on technicalities instead of the global system impact. The team manager or consultant will emphasize the importance of soft skills (or esoteric techniques known only to them).

The truth is that we need all of them. The excellent plan will fall on the bad execution. The best execution for the wrong case will be just a waste of time. We should carefully evaluate the advice considering what we need and what an expert can give us.

Therefore, when we’re reading an article, watching a talk, let’s also pay attention to the place where the person is standing. The perspective from there may be much different from where we are right now. That can be good, as it may push us in the right direction. But it may also be misleading, as we accidentally take biases of this person without understanding the tradeoffs. Personally, I prefer to follow not only people from pedestal but also those that are closer to my position. A bit further in the journey, but not too far. That helps me to calibrate my view as those people are more relative to my daily struggles.

Polish historical leader Józef Piłsudzki reportedly used to say: “Right is like an ass, everyone has its own”.

Cheers!

Oskar